5 players who could have been excellent IPL cricketers but could not achieve success

0 70

Indian Premier League needless to say, is an unforgiving competition for the players. There is an exceptionally restricted edge for mistake and for the outsiders, the margins are extremely thin. Subsequently, on occasion, we have seen a few noticeable names wind up having a poor record in the IPL. On that note, in this article, we investigate five players who might have been superb IPL cricketers yet couldn’t make progress.

Each team is allowed to have 4 overseas players in an IPL playing XI, which is a very crucial spot for each team. The administration will anticipate that these names should win matches all alone. In any case, because of various elements, a few players who did well for their nations couldn’t reproduce a similar structure in the IPL. Consequently, they were dropped and never got a steady string of matches in the IPL after that.


Andrew Flintoff: The IPL was a waste of time... Lancashire was my true love | Daily Mail Online
Image Source: News Image

1) Andrew Flintoff

Matches: 3 – Runs: 62 – Wickets: 2

Andrew Flintoff is one of the players who might have been astounding IPL cricketers yet couldn’t make progress. At IPL 2009 sell-offs, he was the joint-most costly marking. Subsequently, there were a ton of assumptions from the cricketer. Nonetheless, the all-rounder couldn’t set the stage ablaze. He looked half-cooked and couldn’t affect the games for CSK. Consequently, he didn’t get an opportunity later on in the competition.


Trent Boult and Colin Munro end IPL dream of Kane Williamson and Martin Guptill | Stuff.co.nz
Image Source: News Image

2) Martin Guptill

Matches: 13 – Runs: 270 – Strike Rate: 137

The Kiwi opener has been a part of franchises like Sunrisers Hyderabad, Punjab Kings, and Mumbai Indians in IPL. In any case, regardless of being one of the greatest run-getters in T20Is, the player couldn’t do well in IPL. Thus, he got dropped and despite the fact that he played for various teams, outcome in IPL didn’t come in his direction. Despite the fact that he might in any case execute a rebound, it appears to be exceptionally far right now.


Paul Collingwood , IPL Photogallery | IPL Photos 2013 | IPL T20 Photos
Image Source: News Image  


Also Read – IPL: 5 Players Who Have Won The IPL With CSK And Mumbai Indians 

IPL: 5 Players Who Have Won The IPL With CSK And Mumbai Indians

3) Paul Collingwood

Matches: 8 – Runs: 204 – Wickets: 5

Paul Collingwood had the potential to be just the right kind of finisher an IPL side would need in their slot of overseas player in the Playing XI. Add to this, he would have given a few valuable overs of medium speed. In any case, aside from a couple of experiences, the previous English captain couldn’t do well in IPL. Consequently, he is likewise a piece of this rundown of players who might have been brilliant IPL cricketers yet couldn’t make progress.


Ajantha Mendis: IPL with KKR was really special - Sportstar
Image Source: News Image

4) Ajantha Mendis

Matches: 10 – Wickets: 8 – Economy: 7.1

Well known mystery spinners are significant in IPL. Ajantha Mendis was perhaps the earliest cricketer in this class. Despite the fact that he did well for Sri Lanka, he was unable to rehash something very similar in IPL. Afterward, both for his nation and in IPL, Ajantha’s exhibitions descended and was in the long run dropped, from both the IPL team and the national team set-up as well.


All-time Best XI of unsold players in IPL history
Image Source: News Image


5) T Dilshan

Matches: 52 – Runs: 1153 – Wickets: 5

Sri Lanka’s hard-hitting batsman, Dilshan is likewise one of the players who might have been amazing IPL cricketers yet couldn’t make progress. He could have played in excess of 50 games however is scarcely associated with his exhibition in IPL. In the ongoing period, flexible players like Dilshan would have been valuable. In any case, the player couldn’t do that frequently in IPL. Consequently, he is likewise on this rundown.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.